• make text:
Home > Science > Romancing Opiates
Romancing Opiates
  • paper
  • pages
  • ISBN: 1-59403-225-4
  • Published: 08/01/2008
  • List price: $17.95
  • Our price: $12.57
  • You save: $5.38 (30%)

Available on Kindle and iPad!

Also by Theodore Dalrymple

The New Vichy Syndrome: Why European Intellectuals Surrender to Barbarism The New Vichy Syndrome: Why Europeans Surrender to Barbarism

Romancing Opiates

Pharmacological Lies and the Addiction Bureaucracy

Almost everything you know about heroin addiction is wrong. Not only is it wrong, but it is obviously wrong. Heroin is not highly addictive; withdrawal from it is not medically serious; addicts do not become criminals to feed their habit; addicts do not need any medical assistance to stop taking heroin; and contrary to received wisdom, heroin addiction most certainly IS a moral or spiritual problem.

Based on his ample experience as a prison doctor and psychiatrist in a large general hospital in a British slum, Dr. Dalrymple argues that addiction to opiates is not an illness at all, and that doctors only make it worse. They deceive both the addicts and themselves by pretending that they have something to offer.

In this brilliant, entertaining and provocative book, Theodore Dalrymple explains how and why a literary tradition dating back to De Quincey and Coleridge, and continuing up to the deeply sociopathic William Burroughs and beyond, has misled all Western societies for generations about the nature of addiction to opiates. These writers’ self-dramatizing and dishonest accounts of their own addiction have been accepted uncritically, and have been more influential by far than the whole of pharmacological science in forming public attitudes. As a result, a self-serving, self-perpetuating and completely useless medical bureaucracy has been set up to deal with the problem.

With scathing wit, implacable logic, and savage denunciation, Dr. Dalrymple exposes the mythology surrounding addiction to opiates. Moving seamlessly among literature, pharmacology, history, and philosophy, he demonstrates what happens when the nature of a social problem is thoroughly misunderstood, and when human beings are regarded as inanimate objects rather than as agents of their own destiny. His scintillating, iconoclastic little book has an importance far beyond its immediate subject matter.