The False Promise of Single-Payer Health Care - Encounter Books

The False Promise of Single-Payer Health Care

List Price: $5.99
$4.79
You Save $1.20 (20%)
Add to Cart

Also Purchase as e-Book


Publication Details

Paperback / 32 pages
ISBN: 9781641770033
AVAILABLE: 3/6/2018


The False Promise of Single-Payer Health Care

A government takeover of the US healthcare system has never looked more plausible. Support for the idea is at an all-time high. Two-thirds of Democratic voters favor “single-payer” health care; even one in four Republicans is on board.

In this Broadside, Sally C. Pipes makes the case against the single-payer system by offering evidence of its devastating effects on patients in Canada, the United Kingdom, and even the United States. Long wait times, substandard care, lack of access to innovative treatments, huge public outlays, and spiraling costs are endemic to single-payer.

Those are hardly outcomes we should consider foisting upon the American healthcare system.


About the Author

Sally C. Pipes is president and chief executive officer of the Pacific Research Institute, a San Francisco–based think tank, and the Thomas W. Smith Fellow in Health Care Policy at PRI. She previously served as the assistant director of the Fraser Institute in Canada. She is the author of The Cure for Obamacare (Encounter 2013), The Truth About Obamacare (Regnery 2010), and The Pipes Plan: The Top 10 Ways to Dismantle and Replace Obamacare (Regnery 2012). She writes a biweekly health care column for Forbes.com.

Read More

Excerpt

Under single-payer, a single entity pays for health care services. The only entity with the heft to shoulder that responsibility is the government.

If single-payer were to take hold in the United States, private insurance coverage would be outlawed. About 160 million people who get health benefits through work—roughly half the population—and more than twenty million people who purchase insurance on their own would lose their private coverage and have to enroll in a new government-run plan.

Supporters of single-payer claim it can ensure universal coverage for significantly less than a privately administered system. A single government insurer doesn’t have to spend money on marketing. Its administrative costs may be lower, given its scale. And as the only buyer of health care, it can theoretically drive a hard bargain with doctors, hospitals, and drug companies.

Outside the United States, single-payer is the norm. The United Kingdom’s National Health Service was the world’s first single-payer system; it formally launched in 1948. Almost all doctors and nurses in the United Kingdom work directly for the NHS.

Canada, too, has a single-payer system. Health care providers don’t technically work for the Canadian government, but it retains exclusive rights to cover services defined as “medically necessary.” Doctors cannot accept payments for such services from patients; they must bill their provincial government.

Even in the United States, certain segments of the population—seniors, the poor, military veterans—are subject to single-payer.

Its siren song is appealing. Who wouldn’t want free, universal coverage that eliminates premiums, deductibles, copays, provider networks, complicated bills, and the like?

Unfortunately, the reality of single-payer doesn’t comport with that promise. Long wait times, substandard care, lack of access to innovative treatments, huge public outlays, and spiraling costs are endemic to single-payer.

Related Titles